"Putting Evidence Back Into
Running Injury and Performance"
How to Breathe when Running
The question of ‘how to breathe when running’ is one that many runners find themselves pondering, especially those new to running or starting to experiment with more intense sessions like sprint or hill intervals. Should we breathe through the mouth or nose? Is there a particular rhythm or technique we should be using? Let’s take a look…
Mouth or Nose?
Whilst running, you ultimately want to use a system of breathing that allows your body to achieve maximum oxygen uptake every inspiration and maximum carbon dioxide expulsion every exhalation, especially at elevated intensity. The mouth by its sheer size can transfer far more air than the nostrils, so that pretty much ends any argument.
That said, there are benefits for using the nostrils as well as the mouth, i.e. co-breathing; the hairs of the nostrils can certainly help filter pollutants & pathogens, and at lower paced runs use of the nose can help ensure you are giving the body enough time to use the oxygen it has inhaled. However, once you reach a certain intensity you will need the mouth to provide sufficient oxygen. It would seem that for most runners, co-breathing would therefore seem to be the best bet.
A quick search on Google for ‘how to breathe when running’ brings up much talk on ‘breathing rhythms’, i.e. how many steps you should take during the inhalation compared to how many you take during the exhalation. Though this may sound like way too much focus on what at the end of day should happen naturally (more on that later on), for runners struggling with breathlessness taking a look at such rhythms can often help.
> > > > end of free content
For those relatively new to regular running, the notion of introducing maximal effort hill sprints is often met with concern over the possibility of over-training and encouraging injury. And yet, including one or two weekly hill sprint sessions into your training may well be safer than just knocking out long distances on flat ground.
A logical fallacy is something used in discussion / argument / marketing that sounds supportive but is actually based on a misassumption. For example, assuming something /someone must be good because it’s been around for many years is called an ‘appeal to antiquity’. They are worth recognising as soft tissue discussions are full of them.
Some runners swear by it, others say it’s a waste of money. The fact that most elite runners have regular massage suggests there must be something in it, but how valuable a tool is it for recreational runners? Is there any evidence it reduces injury or increases performance? Let’s take a look…